Indhirani v. Balakrishnan (Died) 1.Chitra
Case brief
What is this about?
C.R.P(MD)No.2420 of 2025 (with C.M.P(MD)No.14548 of 2025), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 03.09.2025 by K. Kumaresah Babu J.: revision under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the fair and decreetal order dated 13.08.2025 of the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai dismissing impleadment application I.A.No.6 of 2025 in O.S.No.98 of 2014 — a bare permanent-injunction suit filed in 2014 by Balakrishnan (since died; heirs Chitra, Thirumaladevi, Karvannaperumal, i.e., respondents 1 to 3 / plaintiffs' side) against Kannan and Malaisamy (respondents 4 and 5 / defendants 1 and 2). Petitioners Indhirani, Senthilkumar, Ramachanran, Kanakaraj and Ananthi claimed the property was theirs and the suit collusive; revision DISMISSED with liberty to seek appropriate remedy. Keywords: impleadment of parties; necessary party; Article 227 revision; bare/permanent injunction suit; separate suit for declaration of title; multiplicity of proceedings; Advocate Commissioner visit; District Munsif Court, Manamadurai; advocate G. Ravisankar for petitioners; advocate R. Senthil Kumar for R1.