Disposed¶40

Krishnasamy T v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Mandamus – Service – Secondary Grade Teacher / Head Master of elementary school

Madras HC23 Sept 2025WP(MD)/2392/2022

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022; T.Krishnasamy Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice Abdul Quddhose; writ of mandamus under Article 226; direction to consider representation dated 27.12.2021 within three months; Special Grade and Selection Grade; Secondary Grade Teacher; Head Master elementary school; G.O.Ms.No.75 dated 25.07.2012; G.O.Ms.No.12 dated 01.02.2011; monitory benefits and arrears; Kallar Welfare School, Theni; petition disposed of with direction; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 within three months from receipt of a copy of the order; no order as to costs. ¶40

Krishnasamy T Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022

T.Krishnasamy

: Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶11

Rep. By its Secretary,

¶12

Backward, Most Backward and Minorities Welfare Department, Secretariat,

¶13

Chennai.

¶14

2.The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements), Anna Salai,

¶15

Chennai.

¶16

3.The Chief Educational Officer,

¶17

Theni,

¶18

Theni District.

¶19

4.The District Treasurer,

¶20

The District Treasury Office,

Theni,

Theni District.

1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022

¶26

5.The Head Master, Kallar Welfare School, Ramakrishnapuram, Theni District. : Respondents

¶27

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, issue a of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.75 Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department dated 25.07.2012 and G.O.Ms.No.12, Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and De-notified Communities Welfare Department dated 01.02.2011 and to grant Special Grade and Selection Grade with all monitory benefits of the Secondary Grade Teacher and Head Master of elementary school by taking their entire service as Secondary Grade Teacher and in the post of Head Master from the date of entitlement and to pay the arrears in consequent to the same by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2021.

¶28

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents 1,3 to 5 : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mrs.S.Mahalakshmi Standing Counsel

¶29

2/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022

¶32

O R D E R

¶33

This Writ Petition has been filed for a Writ of Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to extend the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.75 Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department dated 25.07.2012 and G.O.Ms.No.12, Backward Classes, Most Backward Classes and De-notified Communities Welfare Department dated 01.02.2011 and to grant Special Grade and Selection Grade with all monitory benefits of the Secondary Grade Teacher and Head Master of elementary school by taking the petitioner's entire service as Secondary Grade Teacher and in the post of Head Master from the date of entitlement and to pay the arrears consequent to the same by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2021, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶34

2. The petitioner claims that the aforesaid Government Orders are applicable to his case and therefore, he is entitled for the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition. Admittedly, a representation was given by the petitioner for the aforesaid purpose on 27.12.2021. Admittedly, the said representation has not been considered by the respondents till date.

¶35

3/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022

¶38

3. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is directed to be considered within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶39

4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's aforesaid representation dated 27.12.2021, within a period of three [3] months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation as it is for the first respondent to consider the same on merits.

¶40

5. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶41

23.09.2025

¶42

Index :Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No MR

¶43

4/6

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.(MD)No.2392 of 2022