Disposed

Sebasthiyammal v. District Educational Officer

Madras HC22 Sept 2025WP(MD)/23019/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition sought release of death-cum-retirement benefits of a teacher who died unmarried in service, to his sister as nominee and Class II legal heir. The Court directed the District Educational Officer to consider her representation and pass final orders on merits within four months after hearing other Class II legal heirs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2022 for death-cum-retirement benefits and pass final orders within four months.

Sebasthiyammal Vs District Educational Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 22.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

Sebasthiyammal

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.District Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

2.The Correspondent, Joseph's R C Middle School, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release death cum retirement benefit of the petitioner's brother Arul to her nominee the petitioner herein with interest within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Chandrasekar For R-1 : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader For R-2 : Mr.A.Balaji

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to release the death-cum-retirement benefits of the petitioner's brother, Arul, to her nominee, the petitioner herein, with interest, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶19

2. The petitioner claims that her brother Arul died as a bachelor while he was in service in the second respondent school. According to the petitioner, she is a Class II legal heir. As per the service records, the petitioner claims that Arul had declared that the petitioner is also a nominee, who is entitled to receive the death-cum-retirement benefits payable to Arul. The petitioner has given a representation for the said purpose, which has not been considered till date by the respondents. Under these circumstances, this writ petition has been filed.

¶20

3. A counter-affidavit has been filed by the first respondent stating that the petitioner has not produced relevant records to substantiate her claim for payment of retirement benefits payable to Arul.

¶21

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also placed on record the Class-II Legal Heirship Certificate issued by the competent authority, which reveals that the petitioner is also one of the legal heirs.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

¶25

5. In view of the same, this Court is of the considered view that a direction can be issued to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation seeking for payment of the death-cum-retirement benefits payable to Arul and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the other Class II legal heirs, as disclosed in the Legal Heir Ship Certificate, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶26

6. For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 16.06.2022, seeking for payment of deathcum-retirement benefits payable on account of the death of Arul, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶27

22.09.2025

¶28

NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no TSG To The District Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶29

3/4

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

¶32

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶33

TSG

¶34

W.P.(MD)No.23019 of 2022

¶35

22.09.2025

¶36

4/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sebasthiyammal v. District Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sebasthiyammal v. District Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Elangovan.E Vs the Commissionerate of Municipal Administration

John Gnanaraj.J Vs Secretary to Government

Raja Mohamed Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Paneerselvam.S Vs Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Vasanthi Vs The Director

Maria Antony Subash S Vs the State of Tamil Nadu