Dismissed¶18

A.Raman v. the District Registrar

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT – W.P.(MD)No.21028 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019

Madras HC23 Jun 2025WP(MD)/21028/2018

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for amendment of patta/survey particulars in registration records (Patta No.904, Survey No.433/6A11 to Patta No. 4023, Survey No.432/18G; document No.355/2008 dated 27.02.2008); representation dated 24.09.2018 to Sub-Registrar, Karungalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District; petition dismissed as withdrawn with endorsement by counsel; no costs; connected W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019 closed; no merits adjudicated; Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; single judge S. Sounthar J.; decided 23.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019) was closed. ¶18

A.Raman Vs the District Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no costs and the connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019) was closed.

¶18

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to amend the entry from Patta No.904, Survey No.433/6A11 (0.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents) to Patta No. 4023, Survey No.432/18G (1.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents) vide document No.355/2008 dated 27.02.2008 before the Sub-Registrar, Karungalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle; recording the same, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, awarded no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petition. No issue on the merits was adjudicated.

¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT — W.P.(MD)No.21028 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019 — A.Raman v. (1) The District Registrar, Madurai District, Sub Registrar, (Mahal), Madurai and (2) The Sub Registrar, Karungalakudi Sub Registrar Office, Karungalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District — S. Sounthar, J. — Order dated 23.06.2025 — Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to amend the entry from Patta No.904, Survey No.433/6A11 (0.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents) to Patta No. 4023, Survey No.432/18G (1.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents) vide document No.355/2008 dated 27.02.2008 before the Sub-Registrar, Karungalakudi, based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018 — On the matter being taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle — Recording the same, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed — No question on the merits was decided.

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.21028 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.06.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.21028 of 2018 and W.M.P(MD)No.1688 of 2019

¶7

A.Raman ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The District Registrar, Madurai District, Sub Registrar, (Mahal), Madurai.

¶10

The Sub Registrar, Karungalakudi Sub Registrar Office, Karungalakudi, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to amend the Patta No. 4023, Survey No.432/18G to an extent of 1.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents vide document No.355/2008 dated 27.02.2008 instead of Patta No.904, Survey No.433/6A11 to an extent of 0.06.0 Hectare of 15 cents vide document No.355/2008 dated 27.02.2008 before the Sub-Registrar Karungalakudi Melur T.K, Madurai District based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.(MD)No.21028 of 2018

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Thirukkumaran For Respondents : Mrs.S.Jeya Priya Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter was taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶18