Dismissed¶22

Palanisamy.K v. The Superintendent of Police

Madras HC11 Nov 2025WP(MD)/20741/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; W.P.(MD) No.20741 of 2022; K.Palanisamy vs The Superintendent of Police, Karur District; Article 226 certiorari; cancellation of upgradation as SSI; DO.No.344/2016; C.No.A1/9161/2016; order dated 02.06.2016; upgrade as Special Sub-Inspector effective 01.05.2014; pay refixed; respondent proceedings dated 04.05.2023; no representation by petitioner; dismissed as non-prosecution; no costs; Abdul Quddhose J.; judgment dated 11.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

In the absence of any representation on the petitioner's side, the court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. ¶21

Palanisamy.K Vs The Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.20741 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.11.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.20741 of 2022

K.Palanisamy

... Petitioner

-vs-

The Superintendent of Police Karur District

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records culminating in the impugned cancellation of upgradation as SSI in DO.No.344/2016 in C.No.A1/9161/2016 dated 02.06.2016 issued by respondent and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.(MD) No.20741 of 2022

¶20

2. On the last hearing date i.e., on 31.10.2025, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent had submitted that based on the petitioner's representation, he has been upgraded as Special SubInspector of Police with effect from 01.05.2014 and his pay has been refixed. The proceedings of the respondent dated 04.05.2023 has also been placed on record by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent today.

¶21

3. Since there is no representation on the side of the petitioner, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.

¶22

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as non-prosecution.

¶23

No costs.

¶24

11.11.2025

¶25

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶26

krk

¶27

_____________ Page 2 of 4_