Allowed¶29

The Director v. Ramdoss.S

Madras HC11 Nov 2025WMP(MD)/11031/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

condonation of delay; 32 days delay; review petition; Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 CPC; Article 226 Constitution of India; W.M.P.(MD).No.11031 of 2022; Rev.Aplw(MD).SR.No.39213 of 2022; W.P.(MD).No.2349 of 2022; Tamil Nadu School Education Department; Chief Educational Officer Theni; District Educational Officer Theni; Block Development Officer Bodinayakkanur; S.Ramdoss; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Abdul Quddhose J.; 11.11.2025

What did the court decide?

Delay of 32 days in filing the review petition against the order dated 15.03.2022 in W.P.(MD).No.2349 of 2022 condoned; Registry directed to number the main review petition (Rev.Aplw(MD).SR.No.39213 of 2022) if otherwise in order and list it for hearing in the second week of December, 2025. ¶29

The Director Vs Ramdoss.S — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.M.P.(MD).No.11031 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.11.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.M.P.(MD).No.11031 of 2022 in Rev.Aplw(MD).SR.No.39213 of 2022

¶7

1.The Director,

¶8

Tamil Nadu School Education Department,

¶9

College Road, Chennai.

¶10

2.The Chief Educational Officer,

¶11

Chief Education Office, Theni District, Theni.

¶12

3.The District Educational Officer,

¶13

District Educational Office, Theni.

¶14

4.The Block Development Officer, Bodinayakkanur,

¶15

Theni District. ... Petitioners

¶16

Vs.

¶17

S.Ramdoss ... Respondent

¶18

Prayer in W.M.P.(MD).No.11031 of 2022: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to condone the delay of 32 days in filing the review petition against the order dated 15.03.2022 passed in W.P. (MD).No.2349 of 2022.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

W.M.P.(MD).No.11031 of 2022

¶22

Prayer in Rev.APLW(MD).SR.No.39213 of 2022 : Appeal filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 CPC to set aside the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.2349 of 2022 dated 15.03.2022 and allow this petition.

¶23

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader

¶24

For Respondent : Mr.V.Sasikumar

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Mr.V.Sasikumar, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.

¶27

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has stated that

¶28

he has no objection for allowing this application, provided the respondent is permitted to raise all his objections in the main review application.

¶29

This Court is satisfied with the reasons filed in support of this application seeking to condone the delay of 32 days in filing the review petition. Accordingly, this petition is allowed as prayed for.

¶30