Petitioner sought information from Central Bank of India regarding recovery action against his property. During hearing the bank produced its letter dated 10.07.2025 furnishing answers to his eight queries; the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.19632 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.(MD)No.19632 of 2025
S.R.Ratheesh Proprietor of M/s.Adhithya Bharath Gas Agencies having office at D.No.2-143/1, Eraniel Road, Muthalakurichy, Thuckalay Village & Post, Kanyakumari District.
...Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the
1/4
W.P(MD)No.19632 of 2025
respondents to furnish all information as sought for in the representation dated 07.05.2025 forthwith, in the light of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Central Bank of India and another Vs. Smt. Prabha Jain and others in Civil Appeal No.1876 of 2016 dated 09.01.2025 and consequently direct the respondent not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner's property till such time the information sought is furnished by the respondent bank by considering his representation dated 11.06.2025 within stipulated time fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Anandha Rajagopal
For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
ORDER
The Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to
furnish all the information sought for by the petitioner by considering his representation dated 07.05.2025.
Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned counsel, who takes notice for the respondents, would submit that pursuant to the last representation submitted by the petitioner dated 11.06.2025, the first respondent Bank
2/4
W.P(MD)No.19632 of 2025
sent a letter to the petitioner in letter No.RO:MADU:RECV:2025-26:29
dated 10.07.2025 furnishing information sought for by the petitioner. The copy of the letter was also handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner today before this Court. Since the first respondent has already furnished information to the petitioner in respect of the 8 queries raised by him in his representation dated 11.06.2025, no further order is necessary in this writ petition. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the information furnished by the respondents, it is for him to workout his remedy by filing his appeal under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
of. No costs.
21.07.2025
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No csm
3/4
W.P(MD)No.19632 of 2025
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
csm
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.19632 of 2025
Dated : 21.07.2025
4/4
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Central Bank of India and another Vs. Smt. Prabha Jain and othersReferred
Central Bank of India and another Vs. Smt. Prabha Jain and others in Civil Appeal No.1876 of 2016 dated 09.01.2025
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.R.Ratheesh Proprietor of M/s.Adhithya Bharath Gas Agencies
The Authorized Officer / The Chief Manager, M/s.Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Madurai
The Public Information Officer, M/s.Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Madurai
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
