The Regional Provident Fund v. the Employees Provident Fund
Case brief
What is this about?
Common order dismissing as infructuous W.P.(MD)Nos.18292 and 21363 of 2017 (Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, EPFO Sub-Regional Office Tirunelveli v. EPF Appellate Tribunal New Delhi and Sri Ram Nallamani Yadava Colleges, Tenkasi); writs under Article 226 sought quashing of Tribunal orders dated 19.08.2014 (ATA No.930 (13) 2012) and 20.08.2014 (ATA No.929 (13) 2012) arising from demand of Rs.3,70,315/- (order No.TN/TNY/33271A/Enf.I/Circle. 12/12059/2012 dated 27.09.2012); dismissed on counsel's endorsement that entire dues cleared; W.M.P.(MD)Nos.14744 & 17653 of 2017 closed; no costs; decided 14.03.2025 by Mummeneni Sudheer Kumar, J.; respondents did not appear.
What did the court decide?
On the basis of learned counsel for the petitioner's submission and endorsement that respondent No.2 has already cleared the entire dues, making the relief sought infructuous, the court dismissed both writ petitions as infructuous, closed the connected miscellaneous petitions, and ordered that there shall be no order as to costs.