Writ petition challenging an order permitting recovery from pension towards commuted value of pension was dismissed after counsel stated the relief had become infructuous and made an endorsement to that effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)Nos.11827 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
W.P.(MD)No.11827 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)No.8947 of 2019
S.Anthony Manimuthu Sundararaj
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner, Central Provident Fund Organization, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, 14, Bhikaji Coma Block, New Delhi - 110 066.
2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai – 2. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in MD/MDU/Pen-II/45906/2018, dated 26.09.2018, quash the same and forbear the respondents from making recovery from the petitioner's pension towards the amount paid as commuted value of pension.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(MD)Nos.11827 of 2019
For Petitioner : Ms.K.Divya for Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.K.Muralisankar for R2 No Appearance for R1
O R D E R
Ms.K.Divya, learned counsel representing Mr.R.Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and she also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
14.03.2025
Neutral Citation: Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm
_____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.(MD)Nos.11827 of 2019
To
Page 3 of 4
W.P.(MD)Nos.11827 of 2019
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
vsm
W.P.(MD)No.11827 of 2019
14.03.2025
_____________ Page 4 of 4_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether recovery from the petitioner's pension towards commuted value of pension could be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Anthony Manimuthu Sundararaj
The Commissioner, Central Provident Fund Organization, New Delhi
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Madurai
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
