S.Pandiyan v. The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P.(MD) No.16622 of 2025; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; decided 10.07.2025; bench: S.M.Subramaniam, J. (author) and Dr.A.D.Maria Clete, J. Petitioner S.Pandiyan vs Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry and advocate C.Manikandan. Professional misconduct complaint; non-return of bundle and fee amount; representation dated 10.02.2025; disciplinary decree; two years disqualification and third year for non-payment; Rule 35 Bar Council of India Rules; decretal order; Form J-1/J-2; certified copy; execution petition to be concluded within four months; practising despite disqualification; Article 226 writ of mandamus; disposed of, no costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with directions: the Bar Council to issue the decretal order and other documents sought by the petitioner upon application for certified copies; any execution petition thereafter to be concluded within four months of filing; and the Bar Council to verify whether the disqualified second respondent continues to practise and initiate all appropriate actions. No costs.