Dismissed¶30

Vairammal.S v. The Regional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies

Madras HC31 Oct 2025WP(MD)/16341/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Co-operative society Secretary transfer order; writ petition dismissed as infructuous on account of non-implementation of the transfer order; Article 226 Certiorari; Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; Regional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kanyakumari; same-grade transfer contention left undecided; connected miscellaneous petitions W.M.P.(MD).Nos.11810 and 11812 of 2022 closed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent that the impugned transfer order has not been implemented and the petitioner has been allowed to continue as Secretary of the second respondent Society, the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. ¶28

Vairammal.S Vs The Regional Joint Registrar of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.16341 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 31.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.16341 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.11810 and 11812 of 2022

S.Vairammal

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Regional Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Kanayakumari Region, Kanyakumari.

¶11

2.Y-298 South Thamaraikulam

¶12

Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd,, South Thamaraikulam Post, Kanayakumari District, Rep by its President

¶13

3.Felix Selvaraj, Secretary, Thekkampur Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, Kanayakumari District. ... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for records relating to the impugned proceedings of the first respondent in Na.Ka.3024/2019/ThoVesa(2) dated

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD)No.16341 of 2022

¶18

30.06.2022 appointing the third respondent as the Secretary of the second respondent society is concerned and quash the same as illegal.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For R-1 : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader For R-2 : Mr.V.H.S.Prathap For R-3 : Tapal Returned

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated

¶22

30.06.2022 passed by the first respondent, transferring the third respondent and posting him as Secretary to the second respondent Society.

¶23

The petitioner is working as Secretary in the second respondent Society

¶24

and according to him, the impugned transfer order is barred in law, as a person working in a particular grade of a Society can be transferred only to another Society of a similar grade. It is now brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent Society that the impugned transfer order has not been implemented and that the petitioner has been allowed to continue as Secretary in the second respondent Society.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.16341 of 2022

¶28