Disposed¶23

Muthu P v. The District Collector

Mandamus – Consideration of representation

Madras HC3 Jun 2025WP(MD)/14938/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P(MD)No.14938 of 2025; P.Muthu v. District Collector, Thoothukudi and others (including District Registrar, Palayankottai); Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; decided 03.06.2025 by C.Saravanan, J.; writ of mandamus under Article 226 for consideration of representation dated 22.03.2025; disposed of with six-week direction to pass appropriate orders; no costs; no adverse findings; useful only as an example of time-bound disposal of representation-pending writ petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ of mandamus effectively secured by consent: the concerned respondent (fourth respondent) directed to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 22.03.2025 within six weeks from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs. ¶23

Muthu P Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.14938 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.14938 of 2025

¶7

P.Muthu ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District.

¶10

2.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, Korampallam, Thoothukudi District.

¶11

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

¶12

4.The District Registrar, Registration Office, Palayankottai, Tirunelveli District.

¶13

5.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kayathar, Thoothukudi District. ...Respondents

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P(MD)No.14938 of 2025

¶17

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.03.2025 with time frame may be fixed by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Anantharaj For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus, to direct the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.03.2025.

¶21

The learned Government Advocate for the respondents submits that

¶22

the enquiry is pending pursuant to the petitioner's representation before the fourth respondent and he further submits appropriate orders will be passed after due enquiry within a period of six weeks.

¶23