Dismissed¶18

Manikandan. K v. The Superintending Engineer (Highways)

Madras HC3 Jun 2025WP(MD)/13923/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn - Article 226 certiorarified mandamus - challenge to technical bid opening tender summary report dated 30.04.2025 (S.No.3) under Tender notice No.01/2025-2026/D-1 dated 04.04.2025 - Superintending Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads Circle / Divisional Engineer (Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Tirunelveli - withdrawal with endorsement by counsel - no costs - connected miscellaneous petitions closed - no merits adjudicated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Manikandan. K Vs The Superintending Engineer… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.13923 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

W.P(MD).No.13923 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.10078 and 10079 of 2025

¶7

K.Manikandan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), Government of Tamil Nadu, NABARD and Rural Roads Circle, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli - 2.

¶10

2.The Divisional Engineer(Highways), NABARD and Rural Roads, Tirunelveli. ...Respondents

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned technical bid opening tender summary report dated 30.04.2025 in respect of S.No.3 the petitioner is concern in connection with the Tender notice No.01/2025-2026/D-1 dated 04.04.2025 of the first respondent, quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondents to accept the petitioner's tender and to open the price bid of the petitioner.

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P(MD)No.13923 of 2025

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.A.N.Ramanathan For Respondents : Mr.D.Ghandiraj Special Government Pleader

¶16

ORDER

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶18

Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No

¶19

costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

03.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sn

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P(MD)No.13923 of 2025

¶24

¶25

1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), Government of Tamil Nadu, NABARD and Rural Roads Circle, Office of the Superintending Engineer, Tirunelveli - 2.

¶26