A writ petition over a pending trade mark application facing an opposition by a third party was disposed of with a direction that the petitioner file an expedite application before the Registrar of Trade Marks, who must then consider it on merits expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.11.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
Vinaitheerthagounder Jaundice Treatment Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Sumathi Arul, 17/22/1 Thiruvalluvar Street, Yercaud Main Road, Chinnakollapatti, Salem 636 008.
..Petitioner
Vs
(R2 impleaded vide order dated 19.08.2025 made in WMP(IPD)No.24 of 2025 in WP(IPD)No.33 of 2025 by SKRJ)
..Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 04.06.2025 and consequently direct the respondent authority to issue the trademark in favour of the petitioner.
Page 1 of 4
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
| For Petitioner: | Mr.Gajendran Ravi |
|---|---|
| For Respondents: | Ms.M.P.Jaisha, CGSC for R1 |
| Mr. A.K.Rajaraman | |
| Mr.B.Karthik for R2 |
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 04.06.2025.
Page 2 of 4
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
taken up only in a chronological way and no priority will be given. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved, they can file an expedite application before the 1st respondent.
11.11.2025
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Kj
To
The Registrar of Trade Marks, Intellectual Property Office, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
Page 3 of 4
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.
Kj
WP(IPD) No. 33 of 2025
11.11.2025
__________ Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Registrar be directed to act on the petitioner's representation regarding the pending trade mark application opposed by the second respondent?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinaitheerthagounder Jaundice Treatment Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Sumathi Arul
The Registrar of Trade Marks, Intellectual Property Office
Shanthi Sivakumar
N. Senthilkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
