Siloxene Ag v. Controller General of Patents
Case brief
What is this about?
Siloxene AG v. Controller General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks and others; W.P. (IPD) No.17 of 2025; W.M.P. (IPD) No.14 of 2025; Madras High Court Intellectual Property Division; mention; rectification of typographical error; counter statement vs reply; notices vs First Examination Report; patent application reconsideration; writ petition allowed; impugned order quashed; reconsideration within two months; no costs; connected WMP closed; fresh order copy.
What did the court decide?
Rectification granted: paragraph 5 of the order dated 07.10.2025 substituted to record that the writ petition stands allowed and the impugned order is quashed; official respondents directed to reconsider the petitioner's application with opportunity to file his reply to the First Examination Report within two months from receipt of a copy of the order; no costs; connected W.M.P. closed; Registry to issue fresh order copy; remaining portions of the 07.10.2025 order unaltered.