Disposed¶28

C.Ramadoss, v. The Director General of Police

Madras HC3 Sept 2025WP Crl./731/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.Crl.No.731 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Madras, decided 03.09.2025 by N. Sathish Kumar, J. Renuka v. The Director General of Police and others, including private respondents Balasubramaniyan, Siddiyan @ Raja and Lakshmanan. Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 to consider representation dated 26.04.2025 regarding fake appointment order; case transferred to Kolathur Police Station, Salem; direction that if any cognisable offence is made out police shall proceed as per law; writ petition disposed of, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with the direction that if any cognisable offence is made out, the police shall proceed further as per law; no costs. ¶28

C.Ramadoss, Vs The Director General of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.Crl.No.731 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 03.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.Crl.No.731 of 2025

Renuka

... Petitioner

Versus

The Director General of Police Beach Road, Mylapore Chennai

¶11

The Inspector General of Police (IG),West Zone, Race Course Road Coimbatore.

¶12

The District Police Superintendent, Salem District Police Office, Nethimedu, Salem.

¶13

4.Balasubramaniyan 5.Siddiyan @ Raja

¶14

6.Lakshmanan

¶15

.. Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3^rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.04.2025.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 to R3 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The writ petition has been filed directing the 3^rd respondent to

¶20

consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.04.2025.

¶21

Page 1 of 4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.Crl.No.731 of 2025

¶24

According to the petitioner, the private respondent has issued a fake

¶25

appointment order, in this regard, his representation has not been considered. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that now, the case has been transferred to Kolathur Police Station, Salem and

¶26

enquiry will be conducted as per law.

¶27