Fida Fathima a v. National Testing Agency (Ntc)
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition (W.P.No.22863 of 2025, decided 18-12-2025, D. Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.) by a NEET UG 2025 candidate alleging forcible removal of her hijab at the Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women examination centre on 04.05.2025 and seeking Rs.5,00,000/- compensation for violation of Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(a), 21 and 25(1); NTA countered with CCTV footage reportedly showing the invigilator and other candidates wearing hijab; Court held the hijab question is a disputed question of fact not decidable under Article 226 writ jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to establish any compensation claim before the appropriate civil Court; petition disposed of with liberty kept open, no costs. Keywords: hijab, dress code, NEET UG, National Testing Agency, disputed question of fact, writ petition maintainability, Article 226, mandamus, public remedy, fundamental rights, compensation, civil court remedy.