T.Arul Muthu v. Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
TASMAP-free terms: TASMAC Shop No.4110 relocation; writ of mandamus; Article 226; Rule 8 Tamil Nadu Retail Vending (in shops and Bars) Rules, 2003; representation dated 16.09.2019; Pozhichalur / Nehru Nagar / Mayana Salai / Kancheepuram (North); petitioner T.Arul Muthu (counsel M.Selvaraju); respondents TASMAC MD and District Manager (standing counsel K.Balakrishnan); withdrawal with endorsement in Court bundle; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; W.M.P.No.5402 of 2020 closed; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Abdul Quddhose J.; decision date 05.12.2025. Zero precedential content on Rule 8 or shop siting — merits never adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
None on merits. Petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request; no costs awarded; connected W.M.P.No.5402 of 2020 closed. ¶21