T.Muthukumaran v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Thoppu Porombokku land; poromboke; Survey No.25/7; Survey No.25/6; pathway/access by laying road; No Objection Certificate (NOC); representation dated 04.11.2023; Tahsildar recommendation 29.01.2024; District Collector Cuddalore; proceedings Na.Ka.Vi 10/2304349/2024 dated 16.10.2025; rejection of request; cause of action ceased; writ petition closed, no costs; petitioner to work out rights in manner known to law; Cuddalore Taluk revenue officers (District Revenue Officer, RDO, Tahsildar, Revenue Inspector Reddichavady, VAO Madhalapattu, DTCP Assistant Director, Joint Director of Agriculture); Madras High Court, single judge V. Lakshminarayanan, 23.10.2025.
What did the court decide?
Since the District Collector had, by proceedings Na.Ka.Vi 10/2304349/2024 dated 16.10.2025, rejected the petitioner's request, the cause of action for the writ petition no longer existed, and the petition therefore could not be pursued for the relief prayed for.