Disposed¶34
K.Sumathi v. the Commissioner
Madras HCWP/35179/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Unsafe construction complaint Chennai; mandamus under Article 226 against CMDA and Greater Chennai Corporation (Zone-11 Zonal Officer); representations dated 19.08.2025 and 03.09.2025; 4th respondent M/s.R.D. Construction, Porur; settlement terms: Rs.50,000/- paid 05.11.2025 by Mr.Manoharan S. Sundaram, roof replaced, air conditioner restored, pipeline work to complete within a week, complaint against 4th respondent withdrawn; counsels' statements and compliance recorded; writ petition closed (disposed) on 10.11.2025; no mandamus issued, no merits decision, no precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
The respective statements made by the counsels were recorded and the compliance was also recorded by the Court. ¶33