Allowed

G.Azhaguvel v. the District Collector

Madras HC9 Sept 2025WP/33400/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed under Article 226 praying for a direction to the Tahsildar and Head Surveyor to measure the petitioner's property by disposing of a pending online survey application. The court directed the respondents to complete the measurement within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 2 & 3 to measure the property and fix boundaries within two weeks; police to assist if obstruction occurs.

G.Azhaguvel Vs the District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 09.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

G.Azhaguvel

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, Salem District.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.

¶12

3.The Head Surveyor, Office of the Tahsildar, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.

¶13

4.The Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer:

¶16

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd and 3rd respondent to measure the petitioner's property in S.Nos.193/1, 193/4 1/6

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶19

respectively to an total extent of land 14 3/4 cents in Puthur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District by disposing of the petitioner's online application dated 30.11.2023 vide Challan No.20231130011814.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajakumar

¶21

For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate

¶22

For Respondent 4 : Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondents 2 & 3 to measure the petitioner's property in S.Nos.193/1, 193/4 respectively to an total extent of land 14 3/4 cents in Puthur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District by disposing of the petitioner's online application dated 30.11.2023 vide Challan No.20231130011814.

¶25

2. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate takes notice

¶26

on behalf of respondents 1 to3. Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of fourth respondent. By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the

¶27

2/6

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶30

admission stage itself.

¶31

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the property comprised in S.Nos.193/1, 193/4, respectively, to an extent of 14 3/4 cents in Puthur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District. This being so, the petitioner filed an application through online dated 30.11.2023 for the purpose of conducting survey and measurement of the property along with requisite fee. However, till date, no order was passed by the respondents. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition.

¶32

4. Though many grounds have been raised in this writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the petitioner's online application dated 30.11.2023 to survey and measure the petitioner's property and fix the boundaries.

¶33

5. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that the petitioner's online application dated 30.11.2023 would be considered and orders passed within a time frame that may be 3/6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶36

fixed by this Court.

¶37

6. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶38

7. Considering the limited relief sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs the respondents 2 & 3 to measure and fix the boundaries in respect of aforesaid petitioner's property, after giving due notice and opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as aggrieved persons, if any, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to say, in case of any obstruction being created by third parties, the third respondent is at liberty to approach the Police officials/fourth respondent, in which case, the Police officials/fourth respondent shall render assistance to the third respondent to carry out the aforesaid exercise.

¶39

8. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶40

4/6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶43

List this case on 14.10.2025 under the caption "For Reporting

¶44

Compliance".

¶45

09.09.2025

¶46

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No vm

¶47

¶48

1.The District Collector Office of the Collectorate, Salem District.

¶49

2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.

¶50

3.The Head Surveyor, Office of the Tahsildar, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District.

¶51

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,

¶52

¶53

5/6

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶56

4.The Inspector of Police, Thalaivasal Police Station, Salem District.

¶57

W.P.No.33400 of 2025

¶58

09.09.2025

¶59

6/6

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Azhaguvel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Azhaguvel v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Urmila Devi Vs the Sub Registrar

G.K.Suresh Babu Vs the Head Surveyor

R.Babu Vs the Inspector General of Registration

Axis Bank Ltd. Vs Shiju Mathew

V.K.Rajendran Vs the District Collector

M.Jayamani Vs the District Collector