Kudiyarasan v. the Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal as infructuous of writ petition challenging TASMAC retail vending shop allotment/tender order; impugned order dated 9.1.2024 in Na.Ka.No.503/CV-3/2023 by 3rd respondent District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC), Perambalur, in favour of 5th respondent Senthilkumari; relief sought: quashing of order and re-tender for TASMAC Retail Vending Shop No. 6423, Perambalur District; petition under Article 226, Constitution of India, for certiorarified mandamus; petitioner Kudiyarasan; counsel C.Prabakaran (petitioner), K.Balakrishnan Standing Counsel (respondents 1-3), P.Mani (respondent 5); respondent 4 no appearance; Madras High Court; Justice Abdul Quddhose; decided 15.12.2025; no costs; connected W.M.P.Nos.3561 & 3562 of 2024 closed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, the petitioner's learned counsel having submitted that the prayer sought therein has become infructuous and made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle; no costs are awarded and the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.