“26. Insofar as the alleged unauthorized deviated construction put up by the private respondents, they have availed statutory remedies in the form of Special Revisions/Appeals before the 3rd respondent, which are pending for nearly one year and odd. Therefore, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to accord priority and give a disposal to the Special Revisions/Appeals filed by the private respondents, viz., respondents 9, 10, 12, 13, 17 and 18 along with the petitions for interim relief, if the papers are otherwise in order, if not already entertained and take up the petitions for interim relief at the first instance and give a disposal in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order/uploading of the order in the website and communicate the decision taken to the respondents 9, 10, 12, 13, 17 & 18 as well as to the petitioner/party-in-person and till such time, respondents 1, 2 and 3 shall defer further decision as to the demolition of the alleged offending construction. It is made clear that respondents 9, 10, 12, 13, 17 and 18, till the disposal of the special revisions/appeals by the authority concerned, shall not create any third party right in respect of the land and superstructures in question. In the light of the alternate remedy, Clause 49 of the Bye-laws of the 8th respondent Society coupled with Section 90 of the Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and subject to issue relating to limitation of delay and Laches, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his further remedies in accordance with law, before the competent Forum, if he is so advised. It is also made clear that the respective private respondents had
