Dismissed¶31

T.Palanisami Gounder v. The District Collector

Madras HC27 Jan 2025WP/11299/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.11299 of 2021; T. Palanisami Gounder v. District Collector, Tiruppur, South Tahsildar, Tiruppur and Rajeshwari; writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to direct the second respondent to pass an order per the Kurippanai order dated 16.10.2019 in Oh.Mu. 15399/2019/A3; dismissed for default / not pursued on 27.01.2025 after petitioner's counsel (Mr. Stalin) twice failed to appear at hybrid hearings (24.01.2025 and 27.01.2025); no order as to costs; bench: M. Sundar, J. (author) and K. Rajasekar, J.; substantive mandamus issue left undecided.

What did the court decide?

In view of continued non-representation of the writ petitioner at two consecutive listings (24.01.2025 and 27.01.2025), the writ petition is dismissed for default/not being pursued, with no order as to costs.

T.Palanisami Gounder Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.11299 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶7

W.P.No.11299 of 2021

¶8

T. Palanisami Gounder Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

The District Collector Office of the District Collector Tiruppur

¶11

The Tahsildar Office of the South Tahsildar Tiruppur

¶12

Rajeshwari Respondents

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to pass an order as per the Kurippanai order of the first respondent dated 16.10.2019 in Oh.Mu. 15399/2019/A3.

¶14

For petitioner Mr. Stalin – No appearance

¶15

For RR 1 & 2 Mr. T.K. Saravanan Government Advocate

¶16

ORDER

¶17

[made by M.SUNDAR, J.]

¶18

Captioned 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity)

¶19

is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' owing to earlier

¶20

Page Nos.1/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.11299 of 2021

¶23

proceedings made in the previous listing on 24.01.2025 which reads as

¶24

follows:

¶25

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,

¶26

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,]

¶27

There is no representation for writ petitioner either in the physical Court or on 'Videoconferencing' {'VC'} platform. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a daily / regular / routine feature in this Court. With the intention of giving an opportunity to petitioner and learned counsel for writ petitioner, list the matter under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' on 27.01.2025.

¶28