Dismissed¶22

M.Sathya v. the Collector

Madras HC13 Aug 2025WP/28974/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, W.P.No.28974 of 2025 (13.08.2025, Mohammed Shaffiq, J.): writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's request and endorsement; mandamus sought for survey of land and issuance of separate patta from Joint Patta No.716, Survey No.62/2, extension of 83 cents, Pappiredipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District, based on representation dated 09.07.2025; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; liberty granted to pursue remedies in the manner known to law; no order as to costs; no precedent cited, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law; no order as to costs. ¶22

M.Sathya Vs the Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.28974 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶6

W.P.No.28974 of 2025

¶7

M.Sathiya, W/o.Murugan

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.The Collector, Collectorate,

¶11

Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

¶12

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Pappiredipatti Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to survey the petitioner's land and issue separate patta in petitioner's name from Joint Patta No.716, Survey No.62/2, extension of 83 cents based on the petitioner's representation dated 09.07.2025 property situated at Dharmapuri Registration District, Harur Sub-Registration District, Pappiredipatti Taluk, Guruparahalli, Palasamuthiram Village.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Nagarajan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.28974 of 2025

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the

¶21

petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶22

2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to workout the remedy in the manner known to law. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

13.08.2025

¶24

Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶25

arb

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.28974 of 2025