Allowed¶22

Rajalakshmi v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC12 Aug 2025WMP/33073/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Condonation of delay; 201 days' delay in re-presenting writ petition; W.M.P.No.33073 of 2025 in W.P.SR.No.157463 of 2024; Order IV Rule 9(4) of A.S.Rules; Madras High Court; Mohammed Shaffiq, J.; Rajalakshmi v. State of Tamil Nadu and others; Inspector General of Registration; Sub Registrar, Puliyakulam, Coimbatore; R.Meena; delay condoned; miscellaneous petition allowed; order dated 12.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of the delay of 201 days in re-presenting the writ petition in W.P.SR.No.157463 of 2024 before this Court. ¶22

Rajalakshmi Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 12.08.2025

¶3

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶4

W.M.P.No.33073 of 2025 in W.P.SR.No.157463 of 2024

Rajalakshmi

...Petitioner

Versus

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary, Department of Commercial Taxes and Registration, Secretariat, Chennai.

¶9

2.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028.

¶10

3.The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Kamarajar Road, Red Fields, Puliyakulam, Coimbatore.

¶11

4.R.Meena

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

Petition filed under Order IV Rule 9(4) of A.S.Rules praying to condone the delay of 201 days in re-presenting the writ petition in W.P.SR.No.157463 of 2024 before this Court and to pass suitable orders.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents – 1 to 3 : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Writ Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner

¶19

seeking to condone the delay of 201 days in representing the writ petition in W.P.SR.No.157463 of 2024.