Writ petition seeking mandamus to consider a representation for extension of permission to use an underground pipeline through public roads for agricultural water supply. The respondents stated the representation was already considered; the court directed the Tahsildar to respond within two weeks and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/5
WP No. 27116 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24-07-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
WP No. 27116 of 2025
A.Meera
Petitioner(s)
Vs
2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District
Respondent(s)
PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 09.11.2024 grant necessary extension for permission to use the underground pipeline laid through public roads for agricultural water supply from the well situated in S.F. No.262/1A to S.F. No.341/1A2.A and 342/2A Sinjuvadi village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.
2/5
WP No. 27116 of 2025
For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Umapathi
For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing
the respondents to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on
09.11.2024, wherein, the petitioner is seeking for permission for extension of
the use of underground pipeline laid through public roads for agricultural water
supply from the agricultural well situated in the subject property.
2.When the writ petition was taken up for hearing today, the learned
Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents
submitted that the representation made by the petitioner has already been
considered by the 2nd respondent and a proper response will be sent to the
petitioner within the time frame fixed by this Court. The written instructions
received from the 2nd respondent was also placed before this Court.
3/5
WP No. 27116 of 2025
3.Considering the above submission, there shall be a direction to the 2nd
respondent to respond to the representation made by the petitioner, within a
period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No Costs.
24-07-2025
Index:Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ssr
4/5
WP No. 27116 of 2025
To
2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District
5/5
WP No. 27116 of 2025
N.ANAND VENKATESH J.
ssr
WP No. 27116 of 2025
24-07-2025
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tahsildar must respond to the petitioner's representation seeking extension of permission to use an underground pipeline laid through public roads for agricultural water supply.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Meera
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District
The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District
N. Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
