Muthammal v. the Central Information
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court writ petition (Article 226, writ of mandamus) W.P.No.25361 of 2025, decided 11.07.2025 by Justice N. Mala. Petitioner Muthammal (senior citizen, 74) versus Central Information Commissioner (New Delhi), Additional Divisional Railway Manager/Appellate Authority, Assistant Personal Officer/Public Information Officer, and Senior Divisional Finance Manager, South Western Railway, Bangalore Division. Subject: pending second appeal under Section 19(3) RTI Act dated 29.06.2024 before CIC sought to be expedited; preceded by RTI application of 29.03.2024 under Section 6 RTI Act, reply dated 18.04.2024, first appeal dated 09.05.2024 under Section 19(1) RTI Act. Background: maintenance litigation OS.No.197 of 1992 (Sub Court, Sankagiri; Rs.500/- monthly and Rs.1500/- annual maintenance) and REP.No.9 of 2015 (Family Court, Salem) to attach pension of retired Keyman husband P.Murugesan; children Selvaraj and Vijaya. Outcome: petition disposed of with direction to CIC to decide second appeal on merits within eight weeks; no costs. Counsel: Mr.CKM.Appaji (petitioner); Dr.S.Padma, Standing Panel Counsel (respondents 2 to 4). Keywords: RTI Act delay, second appeal disposal timeline, Central Information Commission mandamus, railway pension attachment, Dharmapuri, Sankagiri, Salem.