Dismissed¶24

M/S.Ganesh Lakshmi v. the Director of Municipal Administration

Madras HC24 Jul 2025WP/24819/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal disposal: Madras High Court (N. Mala, J., 24.07.2025) dismissed as withdrawn W.P.Nos.24819 & 24825 of 2025 filed by M/s.Ganesh Lakshmi Construction India (P) Ltd (Director R.Veerakumar) under Article 226 challenging the impugned order dated 04.07.2025 of the Commissioner, Kangeyam Municipality (2nd respondent) relating to tenders ID.No.2025MAWS-569532-1 and ID.No.2025-MAWS-569532-1 in connection with tender in ROC.No.9730/2025/SSI dated 03.06.2025; prayer for certiorarified mandamus to quash and award the tender was not adjudicated; no costs; connected WMPs closed; no precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request, no costs awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶24

M/S.Ganesh Lakshmi Vs the Director of Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.Nos.24819 & 24825 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 24.07.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRs. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

W.P.Nos.24819 & 24825 of 2025

¶7

and WMP.Nos.27981, 27983, 27985, 27986, 27988 and 27989 of 2025

¶8

M/s.Ganesh Lakshmi Construction India (P) Ltd Rep by its Director, R.Veerakumar

¶9

.. petitioner in both cases

¶10

¶11

1.The Director of Municipal Administration Urban Administrative Building Campus No.75, Santhome High Road MRC Nagar, Chennai – 600 028.

¶12

2.The Commissioner Kangeyam Municipality Kangeyam Tiruppur District.

¶13

… Respondents in both cases

¶14

Prayer : Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus call for records the pertaining to the impugned order dated 04.07.2025 tender ID.No.2025MAWS-569532-1 and ID.No.2025-MAWS-569532-1 respectively of the 2 nd

¶15

respondent in connection with tender in ROC.No.9730/2025/SSI, date

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.Nos.24819 & 24825 of 2025

¶19

03.06.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to

¶20

consider the petitioners technical bid as well as the price bid and to award the tender to the petitioner.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Palanisamy – in both cases. For Respondents : Dr.T.Seenivasan, SGP – in both cases.

¶22

COMMON ORDER

¶23

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle to that effect.

¶24