Dismissed¶24

R.Karthikeyan, v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC11 Dec 2025WP/21071/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P.No.21071 of 2019; R.Karthikeyan vs The Secretary to Government, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department and others; pension; admissibility report; Principal Accountant General (A & E); Tamilnadu Pension Rule; Agricultural Officer; Assistant Professor; Agricultural University; non-pensionable service; Article 226; Certiorarified Mandamus; closed as infructuous; no costs; T. Vinod Kumar, J.; decided 11.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition closed as infructuous on counsel's endorsement, with no costs. ¶24

R.Karthikeyan, Vs The Secretary to Government — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.21071 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 11.12.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.21071 of 2019

R.Karthikeyan

.. Petitioner

1.The Secretary to Government, Co-operation, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort St George,

¶11

Chennai -9.

¶12

2.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, No.170, EVR Periyar Road, Kilpauk, Chennai -10.

¶13

3.The Director Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai -05.

¶14

4.The Principal Accountant General (A & E) Teynampet, Chennai. … Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 4 th respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in No.AG (A & E) PEN P27/12721339/5/R2721339 dated 25.05.2018 and quash the same in so far as the remarks in the admissibility report and further direct the respondents to sanction the pension in accordance with the Tamilnadu Pension Rule by taking into consideration of the service rendered by the petitioner from 05.12.1985 to 31.08.1988 as Agricultural officer and

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.21071 of 2019

¶19

to count the half of the services rendered by the petitioner in nonpensionable service in Agricultural University as Assistant Professor from 01.09.1988 to 14.03.1990.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Hemanth for Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Tamilvendan for R1 and R2 Government Advocate Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi for R3 Special Government Pleader Mr.L.Muralikrishnan for R4

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Mr.V.Hemanth, learned representing counsel for Mr.S.Sivakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶23