Padma v. the Secretary to Government
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ of mandamus; land acquisition compensation; Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act 1997; RFCTLARR Act 2013 Sections 26-30, Chapter V, Schedules I & II; SIPCOT Cheyyar Extension Scheme; Karanai Revenue Village Survey Nos.241/1 and 241/2; Tiruvannamalai; Award Notice Na.Ka.No.A2/324/2021 dated 03.02.2025; Revenue Divisional Officer approval; Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai; disposed at admission stage by consent; no opinion expressed on 2013 Act entitlement; liberty to urge before appropriate authority; no costs; connected W.M.P. closed.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to urge entitlement before the appropriate authority (with liberty, per counsel's request, to obtain Revenue Divisional Officer approval and thereafter approach the Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai); authority to decide in accordance with law after hearing; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition (W.M.P.No.23826 of 2025) closed.