Dismissed¶39

D.Lakshman v. the Deputy Inspecto Rgeneral of Registration

Madras HC9 Oct 2025WP/19994/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; Krishnan Ramasamy J.; W.P.No.19994 of 2024; W.M.P.Nos.21886 & 21888 of 2024; Article 226; writ of mandamus; cancellation of sale deed / power deed; Document Nos.6649 and 6818 of 2020; document Nos.3682 and 3683 of 2022; Kelamangalam Sub-Registrar; Krishnagiri District; Hosur Taluk; Deputy Inspector General of Registration Salem Zone; District Registrar Krishnagiri; Tahsildar; representation dated 08.04.024; dismissed as settled out of Court; amicable settlement between parties; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Recording the learned counsel for the petitioner's submission that the matter had been settled between the parties amicably, this Court dismissed the writ petition as settled out of Court, ordered no costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions. ¶39

D.Lakshman Vs the Deputy Inspecto Rgeneral of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.19994 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 09.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

W.P.No.19994 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.21886 & 21888 of 2024

D.Lakshman

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Salem Zone,

¶11

Salem.

¶12

2.The District Registrar, Registration Department, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶13

3.The Sub-Registrar, Kelamangalam Sub-Registration Office, Kelamangalam Krishnagiri District.

¶14

4.The Tahsildar,

¶15

Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶16

5.Sujatha

¶17

6.Seenappa

¶18

7.M.Pushaparasu

¶19

8.M.Sathish Kumar

¶20

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

... Respondents

W.P.No.19994 of 2024

9.Soundar Rajan

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 08.04.024, seeking to cancel the sale deed dated 05.10.2020 vide Document No.6649 of 2020, Power Deed dated 08.10.2020 vide Document No.6818 of 2020 and Sale Deeds dated 01.04.2022 vide document Nos.3682 and 3683 of 2022, on the file of the third respondent by conducting enquiry.

¶27

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran

¶28

For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government Advocate

¶29

For Respondents 5 to 9 : Service awaited proof notified

¶30

ORDER

¶31

The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the second

¶32

respondent to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 08.04.024, seeking to cancel the sale deed dated 05.10.2020 vide Document No.6649 of 2020, Power Deed dated 08.10.2020 vide Document No.6818 of 2020 and Sale Deeds dated 01.04.2022 vide document Nos.3682 and 3683 of 2022, on the file of the

¶33

2/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.19994 of 2024

¶36

third respondent by conducting enquiry.

¶37

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for

¶38

the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably.

¶39

3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶40

09.10.2025

¶41

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No vm

¶42

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,

¶43

3/4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.19994 of 2024