Dismissed¶26

Mrs. Bharti Jain v. Atomic Energy Education society

Madras HC12 Jun 2025WP/1996/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP No.1996 of 2022; WMP No.2151 of 2022; Mrs.Bharti Jain v. Atomic Energy Education Society; Article 226; writ of certiorarified mandamus; Memorandum no.AEES-1(178)/VIG/2021-22/C740 dated 01.12.2021; Child Care Leave; reinstatement/join service with benefits; settlement; proposal approved 12.12.2024; withdrawal letter 04.06.2025; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Battu Devanand J.; decided 12-06-2025; no substantive ruling.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request following settlement between the parties; no costs were imposed and the connected miscellaneous petition (WMP No.2151 of 2022) was closed. ¶26

Mrs. Bharti Jain Vs Atomic Energy Education society — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

Writ Petition No.1996 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-06-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

WP NO. 1996 of 2022 AND

¶7

WMP No.2151 of 2022

¶8

MRS.Bharti Jain Trained Graduate Teacher, Atomic Energy Central School-1, Kalpakkam.

¶9

Petitioner(s)

¶10

¶11

1.Atomic Energy Education Society Rep by the Secretary, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai- 400 094

¶12

The Assistant Administrative officer, Atomic Energy Education Society, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai- 400 094

¶13

The Principal, Atomic Energy Central School- I, Kalpakkam.

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Memorandum no.AEES-1(178)/VIG/2021-22/C740 dated 01.12.2021 issued by the first respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to join service after her Child Care Leave period sought by her with all benefits.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Writ Petition No.1996 of 2022

¶19

For Petitioner(s):

¶20

Mr.Sunil Sandaria

¶21

For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Vijay Shankar, St.counsel for R1 to 3

¶22

ORDER

¶23

On perusing a copy of the proposal approved by the respondents

¶24

dated 12.12.2024, it appears that the parties have negotiated the issue and that they have arrived at settlement.

¶25

2.In view of the same, this Court directed the Registry to list WP No.1996 of 2022 alongwith WP.No.1996 of 2022. Thereafter, on 04.06.2025, the petitioner submitted a letter, which is placed on record by the Registry, wherein, the petitioner has requested to withdraw the above said Writ Petitions.

¶26

3.Considering the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

No costs.

¶28

Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

12.06.2025

¶30

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No dn

¶31

2/4