Dismissed¶¶24

Soundara Pandian v. The Secretary

Madras HC9 Sept 2025WP/18419/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner; Madras High Court; N. Sathish Kumar, J.; 09.09.2025; W.P.No.18419 of 2021; Paazzee Nidhi Niruvanathal depositors; disbursement of Rs.24,74,30,490/- with interest; mandamus under Article 226; District Revenue Officer Tiruppur; Economic Offences Wing CBI (R4 suo motu impleaded 10.08.2022); no costs; no merits decided.

What the court decided

AI extract

Soundara Pandian Vs The Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.18419 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 09.09.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.18419 of 2021

¶7

Soundara Pandian S/o.Korakkan, Secretary, Represented by its Paazzee Nidhi Niruvanathal, Pathikkappattor Nala Sangam, 135 VSA Complex 2^nd Floor, Bethaniapuram, Madurai – 625 016.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The Secretary, Revenue Department, Tamilnadu Government, Secretariat,Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

The District Revenue Officer, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District, Pin : 641 603.

¶12

The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore.

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing,

¶14

Pg.Nos.1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

[R4

¶17

CBI Cases, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai.

¶18

[R4 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 10.08.2022 made in W.P.No.18419 of 2021]

¶19

W.P.No.18419 of 2021

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to further direct the 2^nd respondent to disburse the amount of Rs.24,74,30,490/- with interest to the 1033 members/depositors of Paazzee Nidhi Niruvanathal, Pathikkappattor Nala Sangam, Madurai, in accordance with the 3^rd respondent's Letter No.ne.mu.ka.No.7225/2016/I-1 dated 06.01.2021 and also by considering the petitioner's representation dated 28.06.2021.

¶22

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R4

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the writ petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

09.09.2025

¶26

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ms

¶27

Pg.Nos.2/4

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.18419 of 2021

¶30

¶31