M/S Craft Mold (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Principal Secretary to Government

¶1

W.P.No.18251 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15.05.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

W.P.No.18251 of 2025 and W.M.P. No.20441 of 2025

¶7

Craft Mold (India) Pvt. Ltd. now known as De Diamond Craft Mold (I) Pvt. Ltd. represented by its Authorised Representative C. Manivannan No.116-A, II Main Road SIDCO Industrial Estate Thirumazhisai Chembarambakkam Village Tiruvallur District 600 124 Petitioner

¶8

vs.

¶9

The Principal Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department Fort St. George Secretariat Chennai 600 009

¶10

The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road Egmore Chennai 600 008

¶11

The Commissioner Poonamallee Panchayat Union Tiruvallur District 600 124 Respondents

¶12

Page Nos.1/6

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.18251 of 2025

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the notice passed by the third respondent dated 25.04.2025 and quash the same by declaring it as illegal, arbitrary and in contravention of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Removal of Unauthorised Development) Rules, 2022, and violates the Government Order passed by the first respondent in G.O. (Ms.) No.7, Housing and Urban Development [UD4(1)] Department dated 10.01.2023 and direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's revised planning permission for regularisation.

¶16

For petitioner Mr. K. Roopesh For R1 Mr. L.S.M. Hasan Fizal Additional Government Pleader For R2 Mr. Akhil Akbar Ali Standing Counsel

¶17

ORDER

¶18

(made by G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.)

¶19

The petitioner challenges the Form IV notice dated 25.04.2025 issued by the third respondent.

¶20

Page Nos.2/6

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.18251 of 2025

¶23

It is beyond dispute that the construction put up by the petitioner is in breach of the terms and conditions subject to which approval was granted.

¶24

After hearing Mr. M.S. Krishnan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner yesterday, we clearly indicated that deviation will not be tolerated and adjourned the matter to today.

¶25

Today, the petitioner has filed an affidavit dated 15.05.2025 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the said affidavit read as follows:

¶26

“3. I submit that when the above writ petition had come up for hearing on 14.05.2025, it was submitted on behalf of the petitioner company that the petitioner company would take all effective steps to bring the building under compliance according to the original planning permission sanctioned by modifying/altering and removing all the unauthorised constructions pending the regularisation application before the third respondent and had requested for some time to carry out the necessary modifications. I further submit that this Hon'ble Court was gracious enough to accept the request and had directed the petitioner company to file an undertaking affidavit for the same.

¶27

I further humbly submit before this Hon'ble Court that I, as one of the Directors of the petitioner company do hereby undertake to remove all the unauthorized constructions and superstructures put up in contravention of the original planning permission sanctioned and bring the petitioner company in accordance to the original sanctioned plan granted by the third respondent within a period of four months from the date of filing this affidavit before this Hon'ble Court and request this Hon'ble Court to forbear the respondents from taking any coercive action against the company till then.”

¶28

Page Nos.3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.18251 of 2025

¶31