S.J.Selvaraj, v. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Service law – Writ Petition under Article 226 for Certiorarified Mandamus
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court (Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J.), W.P.No.17483 of 2010, decided 22.08.2025 — S.J.Selvaraj v. Government of Tamil Nadu (HHT&K (G.1) Department) and Commissioner of Sericulture. Petition under Article 226 sought quashing of a 1998 charge memo and G.O.Ms.Nos.122 and 123 of 2009 and retirement with benefits from 30.09.2009. Dismissed as infructuous after the State's compliance affidavit showed charges dropped (G.O.(Ms).No.26 dated 20.02.2014), suspension revoked and retirement permitted (G.O.(Ms).Nos.27 and 28 dated 20.02.2014); no merits decided, no cases cited, no quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
In view of the respondents' compliance affidavit recording that the disciplinary action was dropped, the suspension revoked and the petitioner permitted to retire on his date of superannuation, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it is dismissed as having become infructuous.