Disposed¶21

M.Anbazhagan v. the Commissioner

Madras HC8 Dec 2025WP/14513/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.No.14513 of 2007; Madras High Court; S.M. Subramaniam and C. Kumarappan JJ.; Greater Chennai Corporation; notice dated 10.04.2007 in Na.Ka.No.4164/2007/F; writ of certiorari; Article 226 Constitution of India; private land Tiruvottiyur; Tahsildar inspection with Assistant Commissioner; unauthorised construction; petitioner M.Anbazhagan reported deceased; writ petition closed; no costs; decision dated 08.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

The land involved in the present writ petition is identified as a private land. ¶21

M.Anbazhagan Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.14513 of 2007

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.12.2025

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

W.P.No.14513 of 2 007

¶7

M.Anbazhagan Correspondent, Nivedha Vidyalaya Nursery and primary School, No.1, 10^th Street, Dr.Kalaignar Nagar, Tiruvottiyur, Chennai-19.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Commissioner, The Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-3 (Respondent-amended as per order dt.26.02.2018 by SVNJ in WMP.35766 in W.P.14513/2007) ... Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the notice dated 10.04.2007 in Na.Ka.No.4164/2007/F on the file of the respondent and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Selvaraj

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.M.Sureshkumar, Addl.Advocate General, assisted by Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, Standing Counsel for G.C.C.

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.14513 of 2007

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner died. However, the learned Additional Advocate General would submit that the Tahsildar, Tiruvottiyur, conducted an inspection along with the Assistant Commissioner of Chennai Corporation and found that the property is a private land. However, unauthorised constructions are identified in respect of construction of building. Anyhow, further action on the construction is unconnected with the writ petition, which is to be done

¶20

by following the procedures as contemplated under law.

¶21

2. As far as the present writ petition is concerned, the land is identified as a private land and t h erefore, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs.

¶22

(S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 08.12.2025

¶23

vsi Index : Yes Speaking order : Yes

¶24

¶25

The Commissioner, The Greater Chennai Corporation, Ripon Building, Chennai-3

¶26

Page 2 of 3

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28