Disposed¶26

S.R.Sumathi v. the Secretary

Madras HC15 Oct 2025WP/11015/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ of Mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Teachers Recruitment Board (TRB); representation dated 20.09.2024 rejected by proceedings dated 30.09.2024 in Na.Ka.No.2180/CV3-S1/2024; SC CAT-4 PG Tamil category; SC CAT 4 BV vacancy; G.O.20 of 2023-2024 dated 24.07.2023 notification; writ petition closed with liberty to challenge rejection order; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the TRB rejection order dated 30.09.2024 in accordance with law; no costs. ¶26

S.R.Sumathi Vs the Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.No.11015 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.10.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

W.P.No.11015 of 2025

¶7

S.R.Sumathi : Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, 3rd & 4th Floors, College Road, PuratchiThalaivar Dr MGR Centenary Building, AnbalaganKalviValagam, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600006. : Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider petitioner's representations dated 17.02.2023 and 20.09.2024, the vacancies for a post in SC CAT-4 PG Tamil category and SC CAT 4 BV vacant post and G.O.20 of 2023-2024 dated 24.07.2023 notification, and to appoint the petitioner the above said vacant post and pass orders.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Kalaiselvi

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.R.Siddharth Standing Counsel for TRB

¶13

ORDER

¶14

1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.11015 of 2025

¶17

The present writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 17.02.2023 and 20.09.2024, with respect to

¶18

appointment to the post in SC CAT-4 PG Tamil category and SC CAT 4 BV, as per G.O.20 of 2023-2024 dated 24.07.2023 notification, and to appoint the petitioner in the said post.

¶19

2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the representations of the petitioner dated 17.02.2023 and 24.07.2023 have not been considered.

¶20

3. Per contra, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent would submit that the representation of the petitioner dated 20.09.2024 has been considered and rejection order has been passed by TRB vide proceedings dated 30.09.2024 in Na.Ka.No.2180/CV3-S1/2024 and it has also been enclosed in the typed set of papers.

¶21

4. A perusal of the records shows that the request of the petitioner has been considered and rejection order has been passed on 30.09.2024.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.11015 of 2025

¶25

5. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to challenge the order dated 30.09.2024, in accordance with law.

¶26

6. In view of the above submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for TRB, the writ petition stands closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 30.09.2024, in accordance with law. No costs.

¶27

15.10.2025

¶28

Speaking (or) Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mrn

¶29

To The Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board,

¶30

3/5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.11015 of 2025