TASMAC employee suspension — writ withdrawal — Madras High Court — Article 226 — certiorarified mandamus — suspension order dated 17.04.2025, Na.Ka.No.AI/11433/2025 — Shop Supervisor, TASMAC retail vending shop No.11433 — petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs — connected WMP.No.17580 of 2025 closed — no merits adjudicated.
W.P.No.15553 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.10.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
W.P.No.15553 of 2025 and WMP.No.17580 of 2025
K.Saravanan
...Petitioner
Vs.
...Respondents
1/4
W.P.No.15553 of 2025
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records on the file of 3rd respondent which culminated in suspension order dated 17.04.2025, in Na.Ka.No.AI/11433/2025 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to reinstate the petitioner to his original position as Shop Supervisor in TASMAC retail vending shop No.11433.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Johnson For Respondents : Ms.Saranya, Standing Counsel
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He also circulated a letter dated 06.10.2025 to that effect to the Registry of this Court. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today.
2/4
W.P.No.15553 of 2025
withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.10.2025
skt Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No
To:
3/4
W.P.No.15553 of 2025
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
skt
W.P.No.15553 of 2025 and WMP.No.17580 of 2025
14.10.2025
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension order dated 17.04.2025 in Na.Ka.No.AI/11433/2025 issued by the 3rd respondent was liable to be quashed and the petitioner reinstated as Shop Supervisor in TASMAC retail vending shop No.11433 (raised by the petition; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn)medium confidence¶18
1 provisions across 1 enactments
How this case reached the court
Suspension order dated 17.04.2025 in Na.Ka.No.AI/11433/2025 passed by the 3rd respondent, sought to be quashed along with a direction to reinstate the petitioner as Shop Supervisor in TASMAC retail vending shop No.11433¶18
3rd respondent - The District Manager, TASMAC Ltd., Trichy Region · 17.04.2025
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus against the records of the 3rd respondent culminating in the suspension order¶18
At hearing, petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, having circulated a letter dated 06.10.2025 to the Registry and made an endorsement to that effect on the petition¶21
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
