Dismissed¶23

S.Sithivinayagan v. the Authorised Officer

Madras HC26 Mar 2025WP/1002/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; WP No.1002 of 2025; WMP Nos.1241 and 1242 of 2025; S.Sithivinayagan v. Authorised Officer, Sundaram Home Finance Ltd.; Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai; I.A.No.420 of 2024; I.A.No.419 of 2024; A.I.R.No.757 of 2024; order dated 18.12.2024; writ dismissed as withdrawn; Article 226; writ of certiorarified mandamus; W.P.No.10469 of 2025; K.R.Shriram CJ; Mohammed Shaffiq J; 26.03.2025; no costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

S.Sithivinayagan Vs the Authorised Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No.1002 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 26.03.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

¶8

WP No.1002 of 2025 and WMP Nos.1241 and 1242 of 2025

S.Sithivinayagan

.. Petitioner

-vs-

The Authorised Officer, Sundaram Home Finance Ltd., No.21, Pattullos Road, Express Estate, Royapettah, Chennai 600 002. .. Respondent

¶13

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order dated 18.12.2024 in I.A.No.420 of 2024 in I.A.No.419 of 2024 in A.I.R.No.757 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, quash the same and consequently direct the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai to hear the I.A.No.420 of 2024 on merits.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Vandhiya Thevan Veera for SVV Law Firm

¶15

For Respondent : No appearance

¶16

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No.1002 of 2025

¶20

ORDER

¶21

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶22

In view of the final order having been passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal and a separate writ petition being filed by petitioner in W.P.No.10469 of 2025, counsel seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition.

¶23

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications also stand dismissed.

¶24

(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.) 26.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶25

sra

¶26

Page 2 of 4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

WP No.1002 of 2025