M/S.John Distilleries Limited Vs M/S.Allied Blenders and — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

M/S.John Distilleries Limited Vs M/S.Allied Blenders and — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025

in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

John Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. (formerly John Distilleries Ltd.) No.17/1, Pantharapalya Cumbell Road Bangalor 560 047 Petitioner vs.

Allied Blenders and Distillers Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at: 394-C, Lamington Road Mumbai 400 004 represented by its constituted Attorney S.K. Basu

Intellectual Property Appellate Board II Floor, Guna Complex Annexe-I, Anna Salai Teynampet Chennai 600 018

The Deputy Registrar of Trademarks Trademarks Registry IPR Building, GST Road Guindy Chennai 600 032 Respondents

Page Nos.1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

For petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate for Mr. R. Sathish Kumar

For respondents Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Advocate Mr. K. Premchandar

ORDER

[made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Under the normal circumstances, a petition for modification will

have to be listed before the Bench which made the order which is sought to be modified but in the case on hand, Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. R. Sathish Kumar, learned counsel on record for WMP petitioner, submitted, on instructions, that captioned WMP is being withdrawn and the parties will abide by earlier proceedings dated 22.08.2024 made by a Division Bench to which one of us (M. SUNDAR, J.) was a Member, more particularly, paragraph 7 thereat which reads as follows:

'7. Though it tantamounts to stating the obvious, learned senior counsel before us fairly agreed that the convenience sets will not contain anything post 08.03.2013 (date of impugned order of IPAB communicated to the parties under cover of communication dated 19.03.2013). It was also agreed that the convenience set will not contain any document which was not before IPAB when the impugned order dated 08.03.2013 was made.'

Page Nos.2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

2. Mr. P.S. Raman, learned Senior Counsel, instructed by

Mr.K.Premchandar, learned counsel on record for respondents, on instructions, agreed.

3. Both sides have made a joint endorsement in the case file and scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

4. In the light of the consensus, as it becomes a case of

withdrawal of the captioned WMP and as there is no legal drill qua modification prayer, we permit withdrawal and give a closure to the captioned WMP.

Page Nos.3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

M. SUNDAR, J. and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J. cad 5. Captioned WMP stands disposed of as withdrawn/closed in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (M.S.K., J.) 10.09.2025 cad To 1. Intellectual Property Appellate Board II Floor, Guna Complex Annexe-I, Anna Salai Teynampet Chennai 600 018 2. The Deputy Registrar of Trademarks Trademarks Registry IPR Building, GST Road Guindy Chennai 600 032 W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

Page Nos.4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P. No.36895 of 2025 in W.P. No.19734 of 2013

Page Nos.5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis