M/s.Sri Mutharamman Travels and Transport, v. Hinduja Leyland Finance Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Arb Appeal 33/2025, Madras HC DB (Sundar & Mummineni Sudheer Kumar JJ), 10-09-2025; S.37(2)(b) A&C Act r/w S.13(1-A) Commercial Courts Act appeal against sole arbitrator's order dt.07.01.2025 in I.A.661/2024 in ACP 425/2024 (Indian Centre for Industrial Commercial Arbitration, Chennai); AT mandate terminated under S.14(2) on Perkins Eastman v. HSCC unilateral-appointment ground (order dt.05.08.2025); impugned order effaced, no merits view; appeal disposed as closed with rights preserved; parties free to invoke S.9 Court pending S.11 petition (TNCT0453I2535S734) and fresh AT constitution; repossession/sale of financed vehicles left to S.9 Court or S.17 before new AT; CMPs 22576-22578/2025 closed, no costs.
What did the court decide?
Captioned appeal disposed of as closed with preservation of rights of both sides; the impugned order dated 07.01.2025 stands effaced without any expression on merits; connected civil miscellaneous petitions (C.M.P.Nos.22576, 22577 & 22578 of 2025) closed; no order as to costs.