Disposed¶26

V. Sharmathi v. P. Vimal Dev

Madras HC20 Jun 2025TR CMP(MD)/255/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tr.CMP.(MD)No.255 of 2025; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; K.K. Ramakrishnan J.; Section 24 CPC transfer petition; H.M.O.P.No.255 of 2024 Sub Court Udhamapalayam; HMOP.No.103 of 2024 Principal Sub Court Dindigul divorce allowed 29.04.2025; petition closed, no costs.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition was closed with no order as to costs, and the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition (C.M.P.(MD)No.6693 of 2025) was also closed. ¶26

V. Sharmathi Vs P. Vimal Dev — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED : 20.06.2025

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN

¶5

Tr.CMP.(MD)No.255 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6693 of 2025

¶6

V.Sharmathi .. Petitioner/Respondent

¶7

Vs.

¶8

P.Vimal Dev .. Respondent/Petitioner

¶9

Prayer : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to withdraw and transfer the petition in H.M.O.P.No.255 of 2024 before the Sub Court, Udhamapalayam, to the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Venkatesan

¶11

For Respondent : No Appearance

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.255 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Udhamapalayam, and transfer the same to the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul.

¶14

Page 1 of 5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

The petitioner and the respondent herein are the husband and

¶17

wife. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 28.06.2017 at Kavitha Dhamodharan Marriage Hall, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. Even though, at the time of marriage, sufficient dowry was given to the petitioner, the respondent used to harass her in an inebriated condition and drive her out of the matrimonial home. Hence, she filed a petition in HMOP.No.103 of 2024 before the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, seeking divorce and the respondent also filed a petition in HMOP.No.255 of 2024 before the Principal Sub Court, Uthamapalayam, seeking divorce HMOP.No.103 of 2024 before the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/wife submits

¶19

that the divorce petition filed by the petitioner/wife in HMOP.No.103 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, was allowed on 29.04.2025. To that effect, he also produced a copy of that order.

¶20

Page 2 of 5

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

It is seen that the petitioner and the respondent filed a separate divorce petition in different jurisdictional Court. The petition filed by the wife in HMOP.No.103 of 2024 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul, was allowed on 29.04.2025.

¶23