Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a suit against revenue officials; appellants sought permission to withdraw the appeal by letter dated 11.06.2025. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 20.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
1.Kavitha
2.Chandra … Appellants/Appellants/
Plaintiffs
Vs.
PRAYER:- Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2011, made in A.S.No.17 of 2009 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputhur by confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2007 made in O.S.No.1218 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
1/4
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
For Appellants : Mr.S.Kadarkarai For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate (Civil side)
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has circulated a
letter to the Registry, dated 11.06.2025, seeking permission of this Court
to withdraw this petition.
dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
20.06.2025
NCC :Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No dss
2/4
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
To
3/4
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
dss
S.A.(MD)No.514 of 2012
20.06.2025
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kavitha
Chandra
The District Collector, Virudhunagar District
The Revenue Development Officer, Sivakasi Revenue Division
The Tahsildar, Rajapalayam
K.K.Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
