An application to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner, facing contempt proceedings over a pension fund trust matter, was dismissed by the court, which noted the petitioner had filed the application instead of appearing as directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SUB A(MD) NO. 415 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-09-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
SUB A(MD) NO. 415 of 2025 IN
CONT P(MD) NO. 1829 OF 2024
Bhama,
Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2.
Petitioner
Vs
C.Baluchamy
Superintendent (Retired), 4/17, Vivekananda 1st Street, Mathichiam, Madurai-20 and another
Respondents
For Petitioner :
Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel
For Respondents :
Mr.S.Govindan, for R1 Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, Standing Counsel for R2 and R3
Prayer:
This Sub Application is filed under Section 151 of C.P.C., to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner/1st contemnor on 17.09.2025 as directed by this Court vide order dated 20.08.2025 passed in Cont.P(MD). No.1829 of 2024.
ORDER
This Court has already issued statutory notice to the petitioner herein.
2.However, instead of appearing before this Court, the petitioner have filed this Application for dispensing with the personal appearance of the petitioner before this Court.
3.Hence, this Application is dismissed.
17-09-2025
Mrn
To
1 issue framed by the court
Should the personal appearance of the petitioner/first contemnor before the Court be dispensed with?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust
C.Baluchamy
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
