G.Vairavan v. B.Priyanka pankajam IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for non-compliance with an order dated 26.02.2024. Respondents argued compliance via a subsequent payment. Court closed the petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the payment amount.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the payment amount.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.1028 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.09.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Cont.P(MD)No.1028 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.4342 of 2024
G.Vairavan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.B.Priyanka Pankajam, IAS.,
The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
2.V.Sathasivam,
The Assistant Director of Rural Development (Panchayat), Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act should be initiated due to alleged non-compliance with a previous order.
Whether the respondents complied with the court order by disbursing the arrears of subsistence allowance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Vairavan
- respondent
1.B.Priyanka Pankajam, IAS., The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur
- respondent
2.V.Sathasivam, The Assistant Director of Rural Development (Panchayat), Thanjavur District, Thanjavur
- respondent
3.R.Selventhiran, The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Peravurani Panchayat Union, Thanjavur District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court