In S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005 before the Madurai Bench, a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear on the second hearing.
The Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
Retnam Pillai ...Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
-Vs-
1.Manickam Pillai ...1st Respondent/1st Respondent/1st Defendant 2.Rajalingam Pillai ...2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant 3.Pushpam ...3rd Respondent/4th Respondent 4.Shanthi ...5th Respondent/5th Respondent 5.Selvaraj ...6th Respondent/6th Respondent 6.Mariyayee ...7th Respondent/7th Respondent 7.Kavitha ...8th Respondent/8th Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Decree and Judgment made in A.S.No.35 of 2003, dated 30.07.2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai confirming the Decree and Judgment made in O.S.No.75 of 2000, dated 31.07.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Kulithalai.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Govindarajan for RR1 & 2 No appearance for R3 to R7 * * * * *
Page 1 of 4
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the Decree and Judgment made in A.S.No.35 of 2003, dated 30.07.2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kulithalai confirming the Decree and Judgment made in O.S.No.75 of 2000, dated 31.07.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Kulithalai.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. The appellant remained absent for the second time.
3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
No costs.
23.01.2025
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
Page 2 of 4
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
To
V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Page 3 of 4
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
V.SIVAGNANAM. J,
RJR
S.A.(MD)No.984 of 2005
23.01.2025
Page 4 of 4
Retnam Pillai
Manickam Pillai
Rajalingam Pillai
Pushpam
Shanthi
Selvaraj
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
