Dismissed
Annamayil v. Vasuki
Madras HCSA/2011/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second appeal against a decree reversing the trial court's judgment. The sole appellant died during pendency and no legal representative steps were taken in time; the appeal was dismissed as abated and connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.No.2011 of 2003
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 23.01.2025
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
¶6
S.A.No.2011 of 2003
¶7
and C.M.P.No.18382 of 2003 and C.M.P(MD)No.877 of 2005 and
¶8
C.M.P(MD)No.15740 of 2023
¶9
Annamayil ...Appellant/2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
¶10
-Vs-
¶11
1.Vasuki
¶12
2.Vellachamy(died)
¶13
3.Kathiresan
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Annamayil
- respondent
Vasuki
- respondent
Vellachamy
- respondent
Kathiresan
- respondent
Magendran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court