Second appeal against concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court. Appellant absent for the second time when the matter was taken up for hearing; the appeal was dismissed for default, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.969 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.969 of 2005
A.Akasam Pillai
...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
-Vs-
1.Kutralingam
2.Balasubramania Pillai
5.Arumuga Chettiar ...Defendants/Respondents/Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.02.2005 passed in A.S.No.51 of 2003 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur confirming the decree and judgment dated 13.03.2003 passed in O.S.No.440 of 2000 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents
: M/s.G.Marimuthu M/s.Jothi Basu * * * * *
Page 1 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.969 of 2005
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.02.2005 passed in A.S.No.51 of 2003 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur confirming the decree and judgment dated 13.03.2003 passed in O.S.No.440 of 2000 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellants. The appellants remained absent for the second time.
3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
No costs.
08.01.2025
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
Page 2 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.969 of 2005
V.SIVAGNANAM. J,
RJR
To
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.(MD)No.969 of 2005
08.01.2025
Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Akasam Pillai
Kutralingam
Balasubramania Pillai
Thalimalaisamy
Kadarkarai Pillai
Arumuga Chettiar
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
