R.Ramesh Rajah v. Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default as the appellant was absent and unrepresented when the matter was called for hearing. No costs awarded; no substantive issue decided.
Second appeal dismissed for default as the appellant was absent and unrepresented when the matter was called for hearing. No costs awarded; no substantive issue decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.471 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.01.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.471 of 2004
R.Ramesh Rajah ...1st Defendant/1st Respondent/Appellant
-Vs-
1.Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi Nadar Sangam, Rep. by its Secretary T.K.S.P.Arunachala Nadar. ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent
2.Mohan Rajes ...2nd Defendant/2nd Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.10.2003 in A.S.No.23 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar reversing the judgment and decree, dated 21.01.2003 in O.S.No.152 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Nallathambi for R1 : No appearance for R2 * * * * *
Page 1 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.471 of 2004
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.10.2003 in A.S.No.23 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court, Virudhunagar reversing the judgment and decree, dated 21.01.2003 in O.S.No.152 of 2000 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.
2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. The appellant remained absent for the second time.
3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No
costs.
08.01.2025 1/2
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR
Page 2 of 3
S.A.(MD)No.471 of 2004
V.SIVAGNANAM. J,
RJR
To
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
S.A.(MD)No.471 of 2004
08.01.2025 1/2
Page 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Ramesh Rajah
Virudhunagar Hindu Tholandi Nadar Sangam, Rep. by its Secretary T.K.S.P.Arunachala Nadar
Mohan Rajes
V.Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court